{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg932\uc2\deff0\stshfdbch11\stshfloch21\stshfhich21\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1041{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f11\froman\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 02020609040205080304}\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9{\*\falt MS Mincho};}
{\f15\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 020b0609070205080204}\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e{\*\falt MS Gothic};}{\f21\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02040604050505020304}Century;}
{\f42\fmodern\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e;}{\f43\froman\fcharset128\fprq1{\*\panose 00000000000000000000}@\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9;}
{\f56\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f57\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f59\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f60\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}
{\f61\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f62\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f63\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f64\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}
{\f76\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f77\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f79\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;}{\f80\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f81\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}
{\f82\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f83\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;}{\f84\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}{\f168\froman\fcharset0\fprq1 MS Mincho Western{\*\falt MS Mincho};}
{\f166\froman\fcharset238\fprq1 MS Mincho CE{\*\falt MS Mincho};}{\f167\froman\fcharset204\fprq1 MS Mincho Cyr{\*\falt MS Mincho};}{\f169\froman\fcharset161\fprq1 MS Mincho Greek{\*\falt MS Mincho};}
{\f170\froman\fcharset162\fprq1 MS Mincho Tur{\*\falt MS Mincho};}{\f173\froman\fcharset186\fprq1 MS Mincho Baltic{\*\falt MS Mincho};}{\f208\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 MS Gothic Western{\*\falt MS Gothic};}
{\f206\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 MS Gothic CE{\*\falt MS Gothic};}{\f207\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 MS Gothic Cyr{\*\falt MS Gothic};}{\f209\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 MS Gothic Greek{\*\falt MS Gothic};}
{\f210\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 MS Gothic Tur{\*\falt MS Gothic};}{\f213\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 MS Gothic Baltic{\*\falt MS Gothic};}{\f266\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Century CE;}{\f267\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Century Cyr;}
{\f269\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Century Greek;}{\f270\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Century Tur;}{\f273\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Century Baltic;}{\f478\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e Western;}
{\f476\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e CE;}{\f477\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e Cyr;}
{\f479\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e Greek;}{\f480\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e Tur;}
{\f483\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'83\'53\'83\'56\'83\'62\'83\'4e Baltic;}{\f488\froman\fcharset0\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 Western;}{\f486\froman\fcharset238\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 CE;}
{\f487\froman\fcharset204\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 Cyr;}{\f489\froman\fcharset161\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 Greek;}{\f490\froman\fcharset162\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 Tur;}
{\f493\froman\fcharset186\fprq1 @\'82\'6c\'82\'72 \'96\'be\'92\'a9 Baltic;}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;
\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{
\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs21\lang2057\langfe1041\kerning2\loch\f21\hich\af21\dbch\af11\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1041 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*
\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv 
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\loch\f21\hich\af21\dbch\af11\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{
\s15\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs21\lang2057\langfe1041\kerning2\loch\f11\hich\af2\dbch\af11\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1041 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid9974476 Plain Text;}}
{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid8068310\rsid8220483\rsid9452929\rsid9897063\rsid9974476\rsid13322127\rsid13395440}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.6568;}{\info{\title How to Talk about Israel}{\author Eri\'81\'40Hotta}
{\operator Eri\'81\'40Hotta}{\creatim\yr2006\mo5\dy15\hr23\min59}{\revtim\yr2006\mo5\dy15\hr23\min59}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords4458}{\nofchars25417}{\nofcharsws29816}{\vern24579}}
\paperw11906\paperh16838\margl1753\margr1753\margt1985\margb1701\gutter0 \deftab840\ftnbj\aenddoc\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1753\dgvorigin1985\dghshow0\dgvshow2\jcompress\lnongrid
\viewkind1\viewscale100\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct\asianbrkrule\rsidroot9452929\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit {\upr{\*\fchars 
!%),.:\'3b?]\'7d\'81\'91\'81\'8b\'81\'66\'81\'68\'81\'f1\'81\'8c\'81\'8d\'81\'8e\'81\'41\'81\'42\'81\'58\'81\'72\'81\'74\'81\'76\'81\'78\'81\'7a\'81\'6c\'81\'4a\'81\'4b\'81\'54\'81\'55\'81\'45\'81\'52\'81\'53\'81\'49\'81\'93\'81\'6a\'81\'43\'81\'44\'81\'46\'81\'47\'81\'48\'81\'6e\'81\'70\'a1\'a3\'a4\'a5\'de\'df\'81\'91
}{\*\ud\uc0{\*\fchars 
!%),.:\'3b?]\'7d{\uc2\u162 \'81\'91\'81\'8b\'81f\'81h\'81\'f1\'81\'8c\'81\'8d\'81\'8e\'81A\'81B\'81X\'81r\'81t\'81v\'81x\'81z\'81l\'81J\'81K\'81T\'81U\'81E\'81R\'81S\'81I\'81\'93\'81j\'81C\'81D\'81F\'81G\'81H\'81n\'81p\'a1\'a3\'a4\'a5\'de\'df\'81\'91}}}}
{\upr{\*\lchars $([\'5c\'7b\'81\'92\'5c\'81\'65\'81\'67\'81\'71\'81\'73\'81\'75\'81\'77\'81\'79\'81\'6b\'81\'90\'81\'69\'81\'6d\'81\'6f\'a2\'81\'92\'81\'8f}{\*\ud\uc0{\*\lchars 
$([\'5c\'7b{\uc2\u163 \'81\'92}{\uc1\u165 \'5c\'81e\'81g\'81q\'81s\'81u\'81w\'81y\'81k\'81\'90\'81i\'81m\'81o\'a2\'81\'92\'81\'8f}}}}\fet0\sectd \linex0\headery851\footery992\colsx425\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectspecifyl\sectrsid9974476\sftnbj 
{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta \dbch .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta \dbch .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta \dbch .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang 
{\pntxta \dbch )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb \dbch (}{\pntxta \dbch )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb \dbch (}{\pntxta \dbch )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb \dbch (}
{\pntxta \dbch )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb \dbch (}{\pntxta \dbch )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb \dbch (}{\pntxta \dbch )}}\pard\plain 
\s15\qj \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid9974476 \fs21\lang2057\langfe1041\kerning2\loch\af11\hich\af2\dbch\af11\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1041 {\loch\af15\hich\af15\dbch\af15\insrsid8220483\charrsid9974476 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 How to Talk about Israel
\par 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
The Jewish Problem pops up in the strangest places. In the winter of 1991, at the height of the first gulf war, I asked a right-wing Japanese politician who still wields considerable power in the ruling Liberal Democratic Part
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
y to explain the Japanese role in the Middle Eastern conflict. After clearing his throat with some perfunctory remarks about oil supplies and United States-Japan relations, he suddenly stopped midsentence, gave me a shrewd look and said: "Look, we Japanes
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  aren't stupid. We saw Henry Kissinger on TV. We know how America operates. We're perfectly well aware that this war is not about Kuwait. It's about Jewish interests. It's all about Israel."

\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Perhaps he had read too many books about Jewish conspiracies (\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
Roosevelt was a Jew, Churchill was a Jew, Rockefeller was a Jew, etc.), for which the Japanese market seems to have an insatiable appetite. He was, in any case, not known for his intellectual finesse. But the idea that Israel or Jewish interests are someh
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 o\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
w at the center of world events or, at the very least, at the center of American foreign policy in the Middle East is widely held, and not only outside the United States. No matter what the current American administration does to save the tattered "road m
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 p" toward an end to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, sinister motives are still bound to be imputed. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Earlier this year, Representative James Moran, a Democrat, said that "if it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this." In Britain, Tam Dalyell, a longstanding Labor member of Parliament, expressed a similar view. Tony Blair, he opined, was listening too much to a "cabal" of Jews around President Bush that included Deputy De
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 f\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; an under secretary of defense, Douglas Feith; Richard Perle, a member of the Defense Policy Board; Elliott Abrams, director of Middle East Affairs in the White House; and the former presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer. "Tho
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 s\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e people drive this policy," Dalyell said.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Dalyell was "worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik-Sharon agenda" by British Jews close to Blair. He included among them Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, a Christian, whose rather dis
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 tant Jewish family connections are very unlikely to make him a Likudnik. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The fact that James Moran had to apologize immediately, while the British M.P. was under no compulsion to do so, shows a profound difference between the United States and Europe, \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
or indeed anywhere else in the world. Although Moran's opinion may be shared by other Americans, it is not something mainstream politicians can vocalize. Even legitimate criticism of Israel, or of Zionism, is often quickly denounced as anti-Semitism by va
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 r\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ious watchdogs. In European political discourse, not only is anti-Zionism quite acceptable, but so are vague allegations of too much Jewish influence in public life, especially across the Atlantic. And in the non-Western world, it's not even necessary to 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 k\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 eep such allegations vague.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Rarely can such a tiny country as Israel, and such a relatively small minority as the diaspora Jews, have been assumed to exercise so much influence in world affairs. The special relationship between Israel and the United Sta
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
tes, and the supposed dominance of "Jewish interests" in Washington, is by now encrusted with so many layers of mythology and bad faith that it has become very difficult to discuss Israel's role in American politics critically and dispassionately. Yet not
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 to talk about it invites only more conspiracy theories. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 There are several myths to be considered. The first is the idea that the American or the British government is dominated or manipulated by Jews. In fact, none of President Bush's cabinet members a
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
re Jewish, and the last time individual Jews played a prominent part in any British government was under John Major. Straw, moreover, has spent more time and energy courting Iran than Israel. The well-being of Israel is not Blair's main concern either. In
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
fact, an equitable deal for the Palestinians is more important to the British leader, who badly needs to rebuild his bridges with other European governments. That is why he wants Washington to push the Israelis harder to make peace with the Palestinians. 

\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
There is no doubt that Israeli lobby groups are well organized and well financed and have considerable clout in Washington. But then so do other lobbies. That is how the game is played. There was a time not so long ago when hefty books were written abou
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
t the United States government falling into the hands of scheming Japanese lobbies. It is true that some people in the Pentagon, as well as influential organizations like the American Enterprise Institute and the Project for the New American Century, have
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
close relations with the Likud Party, and especially with Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is much more in tune with American neoconservatism than Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is. Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime min
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ster in 1996, to make "a clean break" from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries. Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Wash
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ngton. In Paul Wolfowitz's words, "The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad." It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 nd "Jewish interests" are not the main reason for it now. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Indeed, Israel enjoys a zealous following among some gentiles, particularly Christian fundamentalists. (In electoral terms, Christian fundamentalists are more important to the Republican Party t\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
han Jews -- there are many more of them, the Christian Coalition is highly efficient and most Jews still vote for the Democrats anyway.) Even though Israel is often described as the only democracy in the Middle East, the Christian right's remarkable devot
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
on to Israel is not necessarily driven by democratic principles. The "Christian Zionists" are convinced by a literal reading of the Bible that Christ will reappear only once the Jews have repossessed the Holy Land. Their other conviction, that Jews will e
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ther die in an apocalypse or be converted to Christianity, is not so reassuring. Still, the Rev. Jerry Falwell declared on "60 Minutes" that evangelical Christians would make sure no American president would ever do anything to harm Israel. At a conferenc
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  of the Christian Coalition held in Washington last year, there were more Stars of David than crucifixes. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Then there are the foreign-policy hawks for whom Israel has been a strategic inspiration. The notions of "pre-emptive" war and "regime change" wer\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
e exemplified, if not exactly pioneered, by Israel. The Six-Day War of 1967 was launched by Israel in self-protection, admittedly in the face of far greater provocation than Iraq ever gave the United States. And the invasion of Lebanon in 1982 was part of
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
an Israeli effort to install a more friendly government in Beirut. Both actions, deplored by critics of Israel all over the world, were seen as marks of admirable resolve by friends of Israel in the United States.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 What we see, then, is not a Jewish cons\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
piracy, but a peculiar alliance of evangelical Christians, foreign-policy hard-liners, lobbyists for the Israeli government and neoconservatives, a number of whom happen to be Jewish. But the Jews among them -- Perle, Wolfowitz, William Kristol, editor of
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
The Weekly Standard, et al. -- are more likely to speak about freedom and democracy than about Halakha (Jewish law). What unites this alliance of convenience is a shared vision of American destiny andthe conviction that American force and a tough Israeli 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 l\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 ine on the Arabs are the best ways to make the United States strong, Israel safe and the world a better place. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Not all Americans agree with this hard line, to be sure: a recent campaign by American Jews to press Sharon into accepting a two-state soluti\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
on shows this. In fact, he now accepts it in principle. Whether he will comply with American pressure to stop building a barrier to keep the Palestinians more or less imprisoned inside the occupied territories is doubtful, especially when Palestinian suic
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
de bombers continue to blow up buses -- and the Israeli government continues to kill Hamas leaders. And there is no sign that President Bush will make a serious effort to make the Israelis dismantle, or at least stop building, Jewish settlements in the Pa
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 l\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
estinian areas. The idea that Israeli and American interests, as defined by evangelical Christians, neocons and Likudniks, converge, as if by force of nature, is not seriously challenged in the United States. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 To judge from much of the world's media, es\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
pecially in Europe and the Middle East, this was always true. In fact, it was not. The turning point was the Six-Day War. It was then that many Europeans took up the Palestinian cause and Israel could count, for the first time, on the almost unconditional
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
support of the United States. In 1947, President Harry S. Truman did join the Soviet Union in backing the United Nations resolution that gave Jews the right to found a state in Palestine. But he did so against the advice of State Department officials, who
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
worried about antagonizing the oil-rich Arab nations. When Israelis fought for the survival of their state in 1948, the United States did nothing to help them. Both the Americans and the Soviets would later have good reasons for discretion about their res
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 p\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 ective attitudes at Israel's difficult birth. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 In 1956, during the Suez crisis, the United States actively opposed Israel's interests. It was an interesting little war in light of today's fashionable cliches about dovish anti-Zionist Europeans and hawki
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
sh pro-Israeli Americans. Israel's biggest supporter and arms supplier in the 1950's was not the United States, but France. That is how Israel got its nuclear bomb. Britain was more ambivalent and tended to lean toward the Arabs. But when President Gamal 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 A\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
bdel Nasser of Egypt, often depicted in the European press as an Arab Hitler, nationalized the Suez Canal, thus cutting out the British and French corporate owners, the British joined the French in an attempt to grab it back. They enlisted the Israelis in
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
this enterprise by encouraging them to attack Egyptian "terrorists" in the Sinai, after which Britain and France would order both sides to withdraw from Suez. The inevitable Egyptian refusal would then be followed by a short, sharp conflict and possibly e
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 v\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
en a "regime change" in Cairo. All went well until the Soviets threatened to intervene on behalf of the Egyptians and President Dwight D. Eisenhower forced France and Britain to back off and the Israelis to get out of the Sinai. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The French remained Isr\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ael's staunchest allies until 1967, when Gen. Charles de Gaulle decided to withdraw his favors. Having only just divested France of its last colonial possessions in North Africa, de Gaulle decided to cultivate the Arabs. He called the Israelis a "domineer
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ng" people and warned them against going to war. As he put it to the Israeli foreign minister, Abba Eban: "You will be considered the aggressor by the world, and by me. You will cause the Soviet Union to penetrate more deeply into the Middle East, and Isr
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 el will suffer the consequences. You will create a Palestinian nationalism, and you will never get rid of it." De Gaulle was not totally wrong on any of these counts.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Until 1967, Israel was a great liberal European cause. Almost everyone on the left sup\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ported it. The promised land of kibbutzim and open-shirted pioneers represented, after all, a socialist dream. Conservatives supported Israel, too, especially the type of people who thought that Jews were all very well as long as they stuck to their own k
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
nd. This attitude was not new. Arthur Balfour, the British foreign secretary whose famous declaration in 1917 opened Palestine to Jewish immigration, was against Jewish immigration to Britain and told Chaim Weizmann, the Zionist leader, that he shared the
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 "anti-Semitic postulates" of certain well-known Jew-baiters. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Guilt, too, had a great deal to do with European good will toward Israel in the 50's and early 60's. This was a time when Jewish characters in German novels took on a saintly air and anti-Sem\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
itic remarks (in public) were treated as a kind of blasphemy. Anti-Semitism didn't disappear, of course, but open expressions of it were frowned upon, at least in Western Europe. If the word "Jew" had to be uttered at all, people lowered their voices, as 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
f embarrassed by the very sound of it. Britain, never having been under Nazi occupation, was less vexed. Having grown up in guilt-ridden Holland, I can remember how shocked I was, sometime in the mid-60's, to hear a young lawyer in London make disparaging
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 remarks about Jews.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
Philo-Semitism is better than pogroms, to be sure, but there was something unreal, and even a little unsettling, about this dutiful sense of collective guilt. It was as if Jews, including Israeli Jews, once again were not treated in 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
the same way as other human beings, which can quickly lead to resentment, not among Jews so much as among gentiles. Zvi Rex, an Israeli psychoanalyst, once put his finger right on this sorest of points. "The Germans," he said, "will never forgive the Jews
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 for Auschwitz." This harsh analysis applies to some extent to non-Jews all over the European continent. Nobody likes to be made to feel guilty, especially for the sins of his father. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 So it was with a certain sense of relief, in the aftermath of the 196\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
7 war, that the European left, led by Communist publications like L'Humanite in France, could point its finger at Israelis and conclude that Jews, far from being saintly, were behaving just as badly as everyone else and, indeed, perhaps worse. Once it bec
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
me clear that the Israelis were not going to give back their conquered territories, the Palestinians became the prime victims to be protected from persecution, and the Jews became the Nazis. Here is L'Humanite on July 20, 1967: "Six million Jews were not 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 s\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 laughtered by the Nazis so that young sabras could on occasion behave like young Hitlerites."
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 In fact, Europeans, especially on the left, had a double guilt complex. One complex concerned the widespread collaboration in the destruction of European Jewry\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
; the other was about the colonial past. France's war in Algeria ended only in 1962, after eight years of torture, terrorism and a near civil war in France. Israel had backed France in this last stand for European colonial rule. Taking up the cause of Pal
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
stinians, Vietnamese and other postcolonial peoples fighting for their "liberation" was a way to atone for past European sins. And because Western imperialism, since the late 60's, was largely associated with Israel and the United States, anti-Zionism and
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 anti-Americanism came to mean the same thing. In this respect, if in little else, the editors of L'Humanite and General de Gaulle were entirely on the same wavelength.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The United States, meanwhile, began supplying Israel with fighter jets in 1968 and be\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
came an ever more reliable friend. But Zionist lobbies were not the main reason. It was the politics of the cold war that paved Washington's road to Jerusalem. Even though President Lyndon Johnson liked the macho Israelis, some of his closest advisers, in
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 c\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
luding Vietnam hawks like Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Walt Rostow, a national security adviser, argued against supporting Israel's 1967 war. But Johnson decided that the United States had to stand by Israel to thwart Soviet designs on the Middle East
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 .\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
If American Jews had anything to do with this, it was because many of them criticized the war in Vietnam, and Johnson needed something to appease these loyal Democratic voters. Since Israel, by then, was becoming a primary focus of Jewish identificati
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
on -- as religion, Yiddish and other Old World memories were fading -- American support for Israel was a popular move among Jews. And besides that, Israel was not only more democratic than America's client states in Southeast Asia but a much brighter mili
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 t\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 ary success to boot. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
The steady alignment of American interests with Israel made it possible for American Jews to be good Jews, good Democrats and good American patriots too. This same period gave birth to neoconservatism, in which Israel played a majo
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
r role. The career of Norman Podhoretz might serve as an illustration. He was once a man of the left who wondered, when "thinking about the Jews," whether "their survival as a distinct group was worth one hair on the head of a single infant." But, as he e
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 x\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
plained in a speech on the occasion of his retirement as editor of Commentary in 1995, he began to change his mind in the 60's, when he became "much more aggressive in defense of Jewish interests in general and of Israel in particular." One reason was a s
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
nse of shock when defeat in Vietnam threatened to turn the United States into a demoralized, enervated, even isolationist power, which would no longer stand up for good against evil in the world. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The other came roughly at the same time. Israel's occupa\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
tion of Palestinian territories made radical leftists in the United States as receptive as Europeans to Arab and Soviet depictions of the Zionists as neo-Nazis. Disgust with this kind of "liberalism," as well as with a perception of American weakness, pus
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 h\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ed former leftists, like Podhoretz and Irving Kristol, managing editor of Commentary, to the right. Convinced of "the inextricable connection between the survival of Israel and American military strength," Podhoretz began to see American dovishness in for
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ign affairs as a direct threat to Israeli survival. This feeling may be shared by some European Jews too, but without the swagger that goes with being a superpower citizen. Ruth Wisse, a professor of Yiddish literature at Harvard, remarked about Podhoretz
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 that "because of the national confidence that America nurtured in him, he is immune to the self-doubt and apologetics that eat up so many of his co-religionists from inside."
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 This confidence is what Podhoretz and other neoconservatives sought to save fr\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
om the wreckage of Vietnam. One of their most powerful political allies in this enterprise was Senator Henry (Scoop) Jackson, mentor of Richard Perle, among others. Jackson, a gentile, a Democrat and a staunch cold warrior, was the perfect bridge on which
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
former leftists could cross over to the right, without actually joining the Republican Party. Henry Jackson was a founder of the America-Israel Friendship League. Israel, to him, was not a sentimental issue but an essential part of his vision of the Unite
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 d\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 States as a nation destined to free the world from tyranny. Arab nationalism and Soviet Communism were seen as equally dangerous in this rather Manichaean view of a worldwide battle between good and evil. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 It goes with Manichaeism (which is, of course,\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 what appeals to Christian fundamentalists too) that battles are not only strategic but also existential. And this, in the eyes of many neocons, is what puts Israel and the United States in the same boat. Podhoretz again: "Just as the fervent wish of the 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 A\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
rab world to wipe the Jewish state off the map derives not from anything Israel has done or failed to do, but rather from its existence alone, so we" -- the United States -- "are hated not because of our policies but because of who and what we are."

\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 roots of neoconservative disillusion with liberalism and the almost obsessive promotion of American power go deeper than Vietnam, however. In Podhoretz's case it goes back to his childhood experiences on a school playground in Brooklyn, where he was bull
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ed by his black schoolmates. Blacks, he had always been told, in good liberal fashion, were poor and persecuted, while Jews were rich and powerful. Neither rich, nor powerful, young Norman grew to hate the boys that beat him up with such ease. As he expla
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ned in a famous essay, "My Negro Problem -- and Ours," he hated them, but also admired them, for "they were tough; beautifully, enviably tough, not giving a damn for anyone or anything. To hell with the teacher, the truant officer, the cop; to hell with t
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 h\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e whole of the adult world that held us in its grip and that we never had the courage to rebel against."
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 This is highly revealing. What Henry Jackson, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu and George W. Bush have in common is th\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
at they enabled bookish men to feel tough, beautifully, enviably tough. Too much can be made of the connection between the Chicago philosopher Leo Strauss and officials in the current Pentagon, but one aspect of Strauss appears to have rubbed off on them.
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
Born in Germany, Strauss was a liberal rationalist in his youth. He had hoped, he said, that anti-Semitism would end with Jewish assimilation in a liberal democracy. The Nazis taught him otherwise. By the 1920's he began to regard liberals as weaklings, p
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 o\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 werless to stop the violent mob. If one thing ties neoconservatives, Likudniks, and post-cold-war hawks together, it is the conviction that liberalism is strictly for sissies. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 By the time Israel was attacked by Egypt and Syria in October 1973, it could\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 no longer be doubted which side the United States stood on, but the size of American largess increased enormously. Before the Yom Kippur War, Congress agreed to an annual loan to Israel of more than $500 million. After the war, this was increased to $2.1
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
billion in loans and grants, much of which went into purchasing American military hardware. Again, the influence of Jewish lobbies can be easily exaggerated. President Nixon was not known for his warm feelings toward Jews, and most Jews did not vote for h
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 m, but he saw Israel as a vital pawn in the great game with the Soviets, especially when they were supplying Egypt with arms. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Once Egypt made peace with Israel in 1979, and switched patrons from Moscow to Washington, challenging the Soviets was no long\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
er a major American concern. But the revolution in Iran, led by Ayatollah Khomeini, produced another enemy to confront. And this new confrontation outlasted the cold war. For Khomeini's brand of revolutionary Islam inspired others. Among the Palestinians,
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
who had always been relatively secular, Islamist extremism gradually merged with Palestinian nationalism. The intifadas began with throwing stones, but degenerated into suicide attacks on Israeli citizens, organized by Palestinians with support from parts
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
of the Arab world. Seen from a particular perspective in America, then, especially after 9/11, Israel and the United States, bound together by cold-war concerns in the 60's and 70's, were now thrown together in an existential "war against terrorism." This
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 shaped a climate in which it is not just potentially anti-Semitic to be critical of Israeli policies, but downright unpatriotic, too.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 If political perspectives have become muddled in the United States by an identification with Israel that is too rarely \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
critically examined, non-Americans are mostly incapable of separating what they think of Israel from what they think of the United States. That is why the Japanese politician I interviewed during the first gulf war automatically identified American policy
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
with "Jewish interests." Japan, like much of the modern world, feels uncomfortably dependent on American economic and military power. When people need to invent a malevolent face for this overwhelming might, they often reach for the prejudices of a hatefu
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 l\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 past. The Japanese politician may never have heard of the 19th-century Russian forgery "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," but it was widely read in prewar Japan and is enjoying a popular revival in the Middle East today. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 It is perfectly possible, \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
of course, to take a critical view of Israeli policies, and of their support in Washington, without being anti-Semitic. It is equally possible to be critical of American policies without being irrationally and emotionally anti-American. Just so, you can b
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 opposed to capitalism, or "globalization," without wishing to unleash or condone suicide attacks on Manhattan. What is disturbing, however, is the way these views now increasingly come together in a hostile cocktail. Most mass demonstrations in Europe, a
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 n\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
d elsewhere, against the war in Iraq contained banners in support of the Palestinians, even the religious extremists of Hamas, and against the global symbols of capitalism. For some people on the left, being opposed to Israel, or Zionism, goes beyond spec
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
fic policies in Gaza or the West Bank; Israel is seen as the colonial Western presence in an Arab world, an American client state locked into global capitalism. Even if the Israelis treated the Palestinians with the most scrupulous generosity -- which the
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 y\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  do not -- this impression would persist.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Not every demonstrator against Ariel Sharon's government or American imperialism is an anti-Semite, to be sure, but the ready identification of Jewish interests with the United States or, in the past, with Brita
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
in is old and loaded with prejudice. Since the early 19th century, many Europeans associated the City of London, as Wall Street is today, with financial power, materialist greed and economic imperialism. To ethnic nationalists in Germany and elsewhere, Br
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 i\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 tain and France, with their relative openness to immigrants, were seen as mongrel nations, where citizenship could be bought for a crock of gold. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 This is what Hitler meant when he called France, Britain and the United States "Jewified." He took the vie\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
w, popularized by all manner of third-rate scribblers, that a Jewish cabal was manipulating Western powers behind the scenes. French universalism and Anglo-Saxon capitalism, so it was believed, threatened the unique values of culture and race. And behind 
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 ll this were the Jews, pulling strings in their cosmopolitan network of banks, newspapers and movie companies.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The United States is now the biggest capitalist power in the world. To the extent that it is an empire, it is driven by economic interests, bu\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
t also, these days, by a mission to spread "American values," as if they were universal. Hollywood is seen in the outside world as part of this, and so are Wall Street, the Pentagon and the International Monetary Fund. This, alas, is precisely the kind of
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15  \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
thing anti-Semites have always associated with Jewish conspiracies. And since Israel is America's most favored ally in the Middle East, and the Palestinian cause has become the universal litmus test of liberal credentials, the idea that Jewish interests a
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 r\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 e driving American foreign policy is even more widely believed, if not always openly stated. American foreign policy and ancient prejudices are reinforcing each other in a vicious circle. 

\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 For Israel, the American embrace is an ambiguous advantage. Alth\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ough perhaps vital for the nation's survival, it also makes Israel the hub of global hostility toward the United States. It is, in any case, doubtful that the fate of Israel is best served by its dependence on an alliance with Christian fundamentalists an
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 d\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 people on a mission to liberate the world with military force. It may well be that Israel's interests coincide with those of the United States for the moment, but this should not be a given, never to be examined or reassessed. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 The first condition for \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
a reasoned examination would be to disentangle Israel's politics from all the anti-Semitic myths and other leftovers of a murderous past. This is not so easily done, since Israeli leaders have too often abused history themselves. The Israeli bomb attack o
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 n\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
 an Iraqi nuclear installation in 1981 might have been justified in many legitimate ways, but to say, as Prime Minister Menachem Begin did, that it was to protect "the children of Israel," asking foreign reporters, "Haven't you heard of one and a half mil
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 l\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
ion little children who were thrown into gas chambers?" is to dangerously confuse the issue. The same was true when Prime Minister Sharon warned the United States last year not to repeat the mistakes of 1938 and sell out Israel like Czechoslovakia. Such f
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 a\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 lse analogies serve only to invite equally odious comparisons from Israel's critics.
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Disentangling American and Israeli interests and government actions is, if anything, even harder. To see Israel as nothing but a cat's paw of American imperialism in th\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
e Middle East is a crude distortion. And to hold Washington responsible for every Israeli action against the Palestinians is equally misguided. But it is neither anti-Semitic nor blindly anti-American to point out that the United States could have done mu
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 c\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 h more to stop Israel from humiliating the Palestinians by turning the occupied territories into a kind of Wild East of gunslinging settlers and hounded natives. 
\par 
\par \hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 Finally, the politics of the Middle East may be murderous, but it is not helpful to see th\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
em as an existential battle between good and evil. As long as such a view persists, among zealots in Washington, Jerusalem and Nablus, the struggle between Jews and Arabs will be forever obscured by a fog of noxious myths and fantasies. Religious fanatici
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 s\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 
m is confounding the politics of Israel, as well as that of its enemies. And its influence is felt in the United States as well. Americans are right to support Israel's right to exist in peace, but criticism of Israeli policies should not be stifled by Ch
\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 r\hich\af15\dbch\af15\loch\f15 istian visions of Armageddon, right-wing zealotry or memories of the culture wars in Brooklyn. This would not be good for America, and it is certainly not good for the Jews. 
\par 
\par }{\loch\af15\hich\af15\dbch\af15\insrsid9974476 
\par }}